Law enforcement agencies do not use real names in everyday paperwork. Informants are assigned a unique alphanumeric code (e.g., CI-1142). All investigative reports, payment logs, and intelligence briefs reference this code rather than the person's actual name. Secure Database Vaults
Most recently, in New Haven, Connecticut, a scandal involving a former police chief who allegedly stole $10,000 from a confidential informant fund prompted the department to adopt a new temporary "special order" tightening policies governing informant funds. Such cases highlight the vulnerabilities in informant management systems and the potential for abuse when oversight is lacking.
Clicking links promising downloadable PDF lists often infects your device with spyware or ransomware. confidential informant list for my city exclusive
Informants are rarely referred to by name in police reports. Instead, they are assigned a digital code or a pseudonym (e.g., "CI-204").
Agencies use coded numbers (e.g., CI #1234) in all internal paperwork. Only a handful of handlers and high-ranking officials usually know the true identity linked to the number. This layers of bureaucracy ensures that even within the police department, the list remains "exclusive." Conclusion Law enforcement agencies do not use real names
Here is the workflow for obtaining an exclusive CI identity in your city:
Under the U.S. Constitution (specifically the Sixth Amendment Right to Confront Accusers and the Brady v. Maryland ruling), a defendant has the right to know who is accusing them. If a CI's testimony or actions are central to the prosecution's case, the defense team can file a motion to disclose the informant's identity. 2. The Roviaro Standard Secure Database Vaults Most recently, in New Haven,
The most critical fact to understand is simple: