When searching for relationship or sexuality diagnostics online, users are typically met with paywalls, aggressive tracking cookies, or clickbait questionnaires. The Sex Values project on GitHub stands out for three primary reasons:

High-value repos are often starred, forked, or cited by reputable organizations like Guttmacher Institute, UNESCO (for sex education), or WHO. Check if the repo is linked from academic papers or NGO sites.

Many top GitHub repos for data cleaning (e.g., pandas , dplyr ) handle sex values as categorical (M/F/other). The “best” practices:

Refers to a person's internal sense of self. Used for UI/UX (e.g., "What is your preferred name or pronoun?"). 2. Recommended Schema Values (ISO/HL7 Standards)

Open-source software thrives on peer feedback. If a question is poorly worded, ambiguous, or excludes certain identities, developers and psychology enthusiasts can submit issues or pull requests to improve the test logic over time. How to Use Your Results for Better Relationships

Avoid using the "Neutral" button as an escape for difficult questions. Use it only when you truly have no preference regarding a statement. 4. Save Your Dashboard

Lean heavily on "Agree" or "Disagree" instead of choosing the center option, which can water down your results.

A massive repository of age-appropriate sexual health information, formatted as Markdown files and JSON-LD. It includes value-aligned FAQs (e.g., "How to talk to a partner about STI testing"). This is less about code and more about content values .

(e.g., from surveys):

: The ultimate community bookmark. Use stars:>1000 to find heavily favored projects.

Some users note that the test may lack nuance for specific identities. For example, individuals on the asexual spectrum have observed that the test might not accurately represent a total lack of attraction, often defaulting them to "bisexual" due to equal scores of zero. Open Source Roots: The project is public on

In 2025, a repository containing a list of domain names for DNS-based filtering was flagged by GitHub for potentially containing "sexually explicit content"—despite containing no explicit images or media. GitHub restricted access, requiring users to be logged in and explicitly choose to view the content. The maintainer appealed, and GitHub later removed the warning, but the incident demonstrated how even a list of URLs can trigger automated content restrictions, impacting discoverability and user experience.

Community discussions on platforms like Reddit suggest the quiz is popular for "just for fun" personality exploration, though some users note it can be "kink-leaning" rather than focused on long-term intimacy. Common Technical Contexts